<ill-get-doc>
  <record xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
    <leader>^^^^^nz^^a^^^^^^^n^^4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">LNC10-000101735</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20071019125749.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">071019nn|adnnnaabn||||||||||^a|aaa||||^^</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">0000000114659613</subfield>
      <subfield code="2">isni</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">(VIAF)1289681</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">NLL</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Pullum, Geoffrey K.,</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">1945-</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="670" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 2002:</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">titlp. (Geoffrey K. Pullum)</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="670" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Kongresa bibliotēkas autorit. ierakstu datne</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="u">http://viaf.org/viaf/1289681</subfield>
      <subfield code="y">VIAF ID</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="915" ind1="0" ind2="3">
      <subfield code="a">20071019.03INGRIDAD</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
  <session-id>H3449L3J88AH3ACKJM6Q5LKR2FN6MTFG22K9ST64X3YFV6H3V2</session-id>
</ill-get-doc>        

Geoffrey_K._Pullum

Iet uz wiki rakstu

• Geoffrey Keith Pullum (/ˈpʊləm/; born 8 March 1945) is a British and American linguist specialising in the study of English. Pullum has published over 300 articles and books on various topics in linguistics, including phonology, morphology, semantics, pragmatics, computational linguistics, and philosophy of language. He is Professor Emeritus of General Linguistics at the University of Edinburgh.[1]
• Pullum is a co-author of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (2002),[2] a comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. He was co-founder of Language Log and a contributor to Lingua Franca at The Chronicle of Higher Education, often criticizing prescriptive rules and linguistic myths.
• Geoffrey K. Pullum was born in Irvine, North Ayrshire, Scotland, on 8 March 1945, and moved to West Wickham, England, while very young.
• He left secondary school at age 16 and toured Germany as a pianist in the rock and roll band Sonny Stewart and the Dynamos. A year and a half later, he returned to England and co-founded a soul band with Pete Gage, which became Geno Washington & the Ram Jam Band when Geno Washington joined.[3] Pullum went by the name of Jeff Wright.[4] The group had two of the biggest selling UK albums of the 1960s, both of which were live albums.[3] Their most commercially successful album, Hand Clappin, Foot Stompin, Funky-Butt ... Live!, was in the UK Albums Chart for 38 weeks in 1966 and 1967, peaking at number 5. The other album was Hipster Flipsters Finger Poppin' Daddies, which reached number 8 on the same chart.[5] The singles included "Water", "Hi Hi Hazel", "Que Sera Sera" and "Michael (the Lover)".[6]
• After the band broke up, Pullum enrolled in the University of York in 1968, graduating in 1972 with a Bachelor of Arts with first class honours. In 1976 he completed a PhD in Linguistics at University College London, where his thesis supervisor was Neil Smith.[7]
• Pullum's work in the 1970s with Desmond Derbyshire, for whom he was the primary doctoral supervisor, established the existence of object-initial languages.[8]
• Pullum left Britain in 1980, taking visiting positions at the University of Washington and Stanford University. He contributed significantly to the development of Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar.[9] In 1983, he and Arnold Zwicky showed that n't is a negative inflectional morpheme, and not simply a contraction of not.[10]
• In 1987, he became a United States citizen. He worked at the University of California, Santa Cruz, from 1981 to 2007.[11] He was Dean of Graduate Studies and Research from 1987 to 1993.[12] From 1983 to 1989, he wrote the regular "Topic Comment" pieces in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
• In 1995, Pullum started to collaborate with Rodney Huddleston and other linguists on The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language,[13] which was published in 2002 and won the Leonard Bloomfield Book Award of the Linguistic Society of America in 2004.[14]
• From 1998 until 2002, he produced 10 "Lingua Franca" talks for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.[15] In 2000, he published, in the style of Dr. Seuss, a proof of Turing's theorem that the halting problem is recursively unsolvable.[16] In 2003, he was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.[17] In 2004, Barbara Scholz, Pullum, and James Rogers initiated a group project on the applications of model theory in syntax, which was supported by the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University in 2005–2006.[18]
• In 2007, he moved to the School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, where he was Professor of General Linguistics and at one time Head of Linguistics and English Language.[12] In 2009 he was elected a Fellow of the British Academy,[19] and, in 2019, a Member of Academia Europaea.[12] He became emeritus professor in 2020.[20]
• Pullum argues against the view, broadly held in linguistics, that languages are scientific objects of study.[21]
• It seems to me that the notion of 'a language' should not be regarded as scientifically reconstructable at all. We can say in very broad terms that a human language is a characteristic way of structuring expressions shared by a speech community; but that is extremely vague, and has to remain so. The vagueness is ineliminable, and unproblematic. Human languages are no more scientifically definable than human cultures, ethnic groups, or cities. The most we can say about what it means to say of a person that they speak Japanese is that the person knows, at least to some approximation, how to structure linguistic expressions in the Japanese way (with object before verb, and postpositions, and so on). But in scientific terms there is no such object as 'Japanese'.[22]
• He also argues that we do not and cannot know whether human languages consist of a finite set of sentences.[23] Pullum advocates for a model-theoretic approach to grammar rather than a generative one.[22] This perspective emphasizes understanding the formal properties of languages, focusing on the relationship between structures and their interpretations, rather than rules that generate those structures. In other words, model-theoretic grammars aim to describe the possible structures in a language, rather than focusing on the process of generating sentences.
• Pullum's grammatical frameworks, such as that in The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, have been monotonic phrase-structure grammars, similar to X-bar theory but with explicit notation for syntactic functions such as subject, modifier, and complement.[24] Monotonic phrase-structure grammars are based on the idea that the structure of sentences can be represented as a hierarchy of constituents, with each level of the hierarchy corresponding to a different level of grammatical organization. X-bar theory is a specific type of phrase-structure grammar that posits a uniform structure for all phrasal categories, with each phrase containing a "head" and optional specifier and/or complement.
• The key difference between monotonic phrase-structure grammars and generative grammars like transformational-generative grammar (TGG) is the absence of transformations or movement operations in the former. Monotonic grammars maintain that the structure of a sentence remains fixed from its initial formation, whereas generative grammars propose that sentences can undergo various transformations during the derivation process.
• Pullum argues that the traditional notion of a noun phrase is correct, and that the so-called DP hypothesis is mistaken.[25] He believes that some kind of fusion of functions accounts for some of the data leading to the disagreement.[26]
• Pullum has been a long-time critic of Noam Chomsky, whom he accuses of mendacity, plagiarism, and general academic dishonesty.[27] He has attacked the argument from the poverty of the stimulus in multiple publications.[28][29][30] He has called Chomsky's Minimalist Program "really just a repertoire of hints, suggestions, and buzzwords", has said that concepts such as Deep Structure and Recursion have "come to nothing", called Chomsky's idea that language arose as a result of a genetic mutation "utterly eccentric", and regretted that Chomsky "turned the discipline of syntactic theory into a personality cult".[27]
• Pullum has coined or prompted the coining of a number of terms that have come to be popularly used including eggcorn, snowclone, and linguification.[31]